Hey could we somehow get <1200 Rapid Tournaments going? As a 1000/1100 player I get crushed when I try to join the <1500 tournament
@Robert_E_630 maybe , but are u sure most under 1200 would join ?and point in tourneys is that we can play strong and weak players , not just winning easily and getting only easy players
the differential is so great that i'm barely learning. I'm jut bleeding pieces in the <1500
@Robert_E_630
Q. HOW DO U LEARN ?
ANS1. BY PLAYING WEAK PLAYERS ( THATS WRONG ANSWER )
ANS2 . PLAYING STRONGER ONES AND STUDYING THEM . ( THATS THE CORRECT WAY TO LEARN SOON )
Q. HOW DO U LEARN ?
ANS1. BY PLAYING WEAK PLAYERS ( THATS WRONG ANSWER )
ANS2 . PLAYING STRONGER ONES AND STUDYING THEM . ( THATS THE CORRECT WAY TO LEARN SOON )
Git gud You won't blunder as much
well by your logic - why do the 1500 and 1700 brackets exist? everyone should just play 2000 players
@Robert_E_630 I too agree with that , and hence real improvers like playing strong ones , however being in the feedback section I would not continue about chess but afcourse lichess wouldn't add 1200 ones
Go play stock fish level 10 all day because that’s supposedly the only way you can learn
I also created a topic on the forum with this question: lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/shouldt-there-be-tournaments-for-beginners-which-could-be-won-by-beginners
I wonder whether @lichess will ever add such such <1300 or <1200 tournaments to the official tournaments calendars. That would be much preferable to creating a team for those, which would be much less visible than something created by us; because we'd be unable to advertise on @lichess anyway...
I wonder whether @lichess will ever add such such <1300 or <1200 tournaments to the official tournaments calendars. That would be much preferable to creating a team for those, which would be much less visible than something created by us; because we'd be unable to advertise on @lichess anyway...
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.